When Flavor Fights Back: Solving Metallic Aftertaste in a 30-Component Sachet
More Isn’t Always Better — Especially in Taste Chemistry
Lifestyle supplement sachets are booming — fast, flavorful, and loaded with wellness claims. But when a client asked us to develop a sachet with 30+ active components, flavored and naturally sweetened, we knew we’d be testing the limits of functional complexity.
At first, everything seemed fine:
A strong, metallic, almost bloody aftertaste — unmistakable and persistent.
This is the story of how we isolated the problem, ran multiple R&D trials, and saved the formulation.
Lifestyle supplement sachets are booming — fast, flavorful, and loaded with wellness claims. But when a client asked us to develop a sachet with 30+ active components, flavored and naturally sweetened, we knew we’d be testing the limits of functional complexity.
At first, everything seemed fine:
- The formula worked on paper
- The flavor was balanced
- The smell was pleasant
A strong, metallic, almost bloody aftertaste — unmistakable and persistent.
This is the story of how we isolated the problem, ran multiple R&D trials, and saved the formulation.
More Isn’t Always Better
The Flavor Was Good — Until It Wasn’t
Our team successfully blended and flavored the formula. But internal tasting quickly flagged a major sensory issue:
- Metallic taste on the front and back of the tongue
- Lingering “bloody” aftertaste (common in some iron sources)
- Unpleasant film in the mouth post-drink
Suspecting Iron (Ferrum) — But Why Here, Not in Others?
The formula contained iron (Fe) — initially added as part of a broad-spectrum mineral profile. This is standard in lifestyle and energy sachets, and typically not problematic.
But in this case, even after testing multiple iron sources, the taste persisted:
But in this case, even after testing multiple iron sources, the taste persisted:
- Fe(II) salts (ferrous sulfate, fumarate)
- Fe(III) salts (ferric pyrophosphate, citrate)
- Chelated and micronized forms
What Was Really Happening? Colloidal Chemistry in Action
Although we didn’t fully isolate the exact interaction, our working hypothesis centered around colloidal and ionic interactions, likely involving:
These effects are hard to model in silico — only real-world testing exposes them.
- Acidic pH from flavor agents
- Polyphenolic or reducing components (e.g. vitamin C, herbal extracts)
- Iron reacting to form metal-tannin or metal-flavonoid complexes
- Micelle-like structures or charge-based agglomerates forming in liquid
These effects are hard to model in silico — only real-world testing exposes them.
R&D Trials Confirmed the Culprit — Iron Had to Go
After two rounds of controlled trials, we concluded:
- All forms of iron led to the same unpleasant aftertaste
- Removal of iron instantly resolved the sensory issue
- Removed all Fe salts from the blend
- Adjusted the nutritional panel accordingly
- Retained the rest of the 30+ components without further issue
Sachet Cleared, Sent to Client for Evaluation
With iron removed, the formula was:
- Flavor-stable
- Smooth in mouthfeel
- Free from metallic or off-tastes
Explore BF-EssE's other services
Partner with BF‑Esse for high-quality capsules, sachets, or liquid drops.
We’ll help you create a product that’s effective, compliant, and ready for your market.